Cartonboard is an industry name for non-corrugated cardboard or packaging card.
The research compares the cradle-to-grave carbon footprint of the complete packaging around a product, rather than comparing materials by weight.
“It’s known that the carbon impact per tonne of material is much lower for cartonboard than polymers regardless of whether you look just at fossil emissions or also take the biogenic emissions and removals into consideration,” said Pro Carton general manager Tony Hitchin. “We wanted to compare products on a per-unit basis as cartonboard packaging may not weigh the same as a fossil-based solution. Furthermore, the conversion and end-of-life impacts for each of the solutions will be different. That’s why in this study we have compared specific packaging solutions for the similar products on a cradle-to-grave basis.”
Cradle-to-grave comparisons include everything from mining or growing the raw materials to final disposal.
The study reports both fossil green-house-gas (GHG) emissions from non-renewable sources and biogenic GHG emissions and removals – removals are from atmospheric CO2 used by photosynthesis for biomass growth.
“Whilst the unique aspects of the life-cycle of fibre-based packaging are taken into account when calculating the total carbon footprint, we also wanted to see what the results would be when only the fossil GHG emissions were considered,” said Hitchin.
RISE HDMI cable packaging case study – figures are kg of CO2e per 1,000 packs
|Fossil GHG emissions||Biogenic GHG emissions||Biogenic GHG removals||dLUC emissions||Total GHG emissions and removals|
|PVC blister plus cartonboard fitments||235.5||20.2||-32.3||0.2||223.6|
RISE pre packaging factory carbon footprints
for making packaging
|total carbon footprint
kg CO2e per tonne
|fossil carbon footprint
kg CO2e per tonne
|amorphous PET granulate||3,093||3,089||Ecoinvent 3.6|
|LDPE granulate||2,305||2,286||Ecoinvent 3.6|
|HDPE granulate||2,110||2,092||Ecoinvent 3.6|
The report is ‘Comparing the carbon footprint of carton packaging against alternative solutions‘ (navigate to page 17). According to the document, it was peer-reviewed by quality assurance company Intertek.